Click here to check if anything new just came in.
February 07 2010
February 04 2010
February 03 2010
February 01 2010
Created by Sam Johnston from Wikipedia
There are quite a few CAD people talking about cloud computing in 2010. It’s a term that has been extremely overused (kind of like “social media” ) so I thought a quick post might help lift the fog
Acording to Wikipedia, “The term ‘cloud’ is used as a metaphor for the Internet”. There are a number of more tangible technologies that make up Cloud computing with names like SaaS, HaaS/IaaS, Web services, SOA, MSP, and Web 2.0. For this post, lets keep things simple and avoid the acronyms and fancy names.
Below is a short youtube video that explains cloud computing in a simple and direct way.
I’ll also point you to a simple “How Stuff Works” article which explains a bit why cloud computing is useful.
Of course, as with most things ,cloud computing creates some concerns. In Ira WInkler's "The Real Problem With Cloud Computing", he says “Cloud computing puts your data outside of your organization”. He is concerned with security and levels of control that may be missing in a Cloud bases solution.
After security, the next concern is the network. Moving data between your computer /network device to the cloud takes more time than moving to your local harddrive. Applications need to make efficient use of the bandwidth and/or networks need to be upgraded to support the greater volume of data and higher levels of reliability. These problem lead to a trust problem that has slowed cloud computing in its early years. However, IMHO, trust is building and Gartner has identified it as one of 2010 top strategic Technologies.
Now I haven’t really touched on what this all means to PLM and CAD. It something that does come up in many discussions and I think that its going to be an interesting topic for 2010. So stay tuned…
January 26 2010
3D Model of the Month
For those of you who received one of our print 2010 calendars, you saw this bar dispenser, aka a “bar gun”, from Schroeder America gracing the month of January. All of the images can be seen in our Global Image Gallery. The “Best in Class” are the 12 who appear on the print edition.
Now if you were a kid like me who grew up in a household where soda was a special treat, you probably like the idea of a gun that shoots a near endless supply of the sweet juices. If you’re a designer or engineer, you'd probably like to know a little more about this design.
Deborah Absalon from Schroeder America was kind enough to fill us in.
Q: How did the ICON bar gun get its name?
A: The term “Bar gun” is a common reference in the industry. We made several improvements to the industry standard and wanted to give our product its own name to differentiate it. Our Marketing department chose the name “ICON” to represent a new image in bar gun technology.
Q: Who are your primary customers and what is most important to them in this product?
A: Our primary customers are Coca-Cola and Pepsi. They have their own red and blue bar guns, respectively. The black ICON Bar Gun is primarily sold to “neutral” bars and restaurants, primarily through distributors.
Q: Was this a new design or redesign?
A: The ICON is a new product for us – we are in fact a new company, only 3 years old. The design is actually a redesign of the existing industry standard.
Q: What were the design challenges you faced? How did you address them?
A: We wanted to make a dispenser that was more reliable, easier to service, and most importantly had better ratio control (for a more accurately mixed, better tasting drink). In order to do so, we had to completely redesign the manifold/valve system, incorporating our flow controls and adding a positive shutoff to the system. We redesigned the handle itself to allow greater flow, used better materials for durability, and developed a manufacturing process to ensure greater accuracy in machining. The biggest challenge was identifying the negative aspects of our competitors product, while incorporating designs changes into our product that our customers were asking for, thus giving the “ICON” a competitive advantage in the market place.
Q: Tell me about the complexity of a design like this. How difficult is it to create one product that outputs multiple different liquids? How many designers worked on this gun?
A: The design is surprisingly complex. You have many places - from nozzle, through the handle, the sheath, flow controls, and shutoff assembly – where fluids can leak. In a restaurant or bar, a leak equals disaster. Also, there are strict NSF requirements for any material coming in contact with water/soda. We were a brand new company, with a design team of 3 people – myself, our main engineer David Santy, and our company founder Jud Schroeder. We relied very heavily on our VP of Manufacturing, Sam Brown, and his manufacturing personnel to help us develop the manufacturing processes concurrently with our ongoing design.
Q: Once you complete the design, where does it go from there?
A: It’s not as simple as completing the design and then sending it off to manufacturing. Being a startup company, it was imperative to bring a product to market as quickly as possible. So design and manufacturing really had to be concurrent processes. The handle laminates were designed in NX, programmed in NX Machining, and sent to our Mazak milling machines. While manufacturing was working out how best to bond the laminates, we were designing other aspects of the bar gun, including over 80 plastic parts. We used SLA and machined parts directly from NX to prototype. So while our plastic parts tools were being made, we were working out manufacturing processes, including pressure testing devices, etc.
Q: Do you test these guns out at your office? Is there an endless supply of soda and water? And be honest, do you ever have a drink fight (vs. food fight) with these guns
?
A: Yes, we do test the bar guns at our facility. In addition to using pressure decay testing throughout the manufacturing process, we perform a check on the final assembly using pressure decay testing as well as pressurized water testing to ensure there are no leaks in the system. The final step of the process includes a sanitization cycle using chlorinated fluids, which are blown out before being placed into inventory.
Q: Anything else you think might be of interest to other design engineers about the gun or other work Schroeder does?
A: We have 3 horizontal Mazak milling centers, 2 vertical Mazak milling centers, 1 vertical Hurco CNC milling machine, all equipped with automated tool changers. We also have 3 Cincinnati molding presses, ranging between 55 tons and 138 tons. We have a Dukane high output ultrasonic welder, a Dukane spin welder, specially designed SoftTest equipment for valve testing, a specially built Printex pad printer, and a specially built Acme micro-welder for parts assembly. Lastly, we have the latest technology in evacuation/refrigerant charging equipment.
We use rendered images heavily in the early design phase of a product to make sure the customer is getting the look they want. NX Shape Studio is a must-have there.
Lastly, there definitely is a continuous supply of water/soda, as we’re always testing some new process, material, or configuration. We also produce a “Bubbler” – think lemonade at Chik-Fil-A (fast food restaurant) – and a couple of those are usually set up and running as well. Did I mention the 29 degree counter top beer unit? I’m just waiting for a chance to design a Margarita machine!
Thanks Deborah for taking the time to answer some questions.
Stay tuned for next month’s model of the month. In the meantime, visit the other design contest images in the “Special Selections” and “Images from Around the World” galleries.
if you want your own print copy of the calendar, you can request one here (if you’re in the Americas). If you’re in Europe or Asia Pacific, leave a comment and we’ll get you in contact with the right person.
January 25 2010
What do I want from an Apple “tablet”
Wouldn’t it be cool if a new device could combine all these into a single hybrid device so I can listen to music, surf the web anywhere anytime, read books and news papers, watch movies, take notes, jot down ideas and observations, work on my presentations and even make phone calls? And to top it off it would have multi-touch interface that goes beyond iPhone i.e., I could flip a page as I do with normal books, or I could drop & drag objects with touch, or I could draw, sketch, write, etc with my fingers!
Apple is rumored to introduce a new “tablet" gizmo this week.The hype and mystery surrounding has created tremendous buzz. There are many unconfirmed reports about what it is, its capabilities and specifications.
Apple has always been able to take dots – technologies- and connect them. iPod was not the first MP3 player but what iPod did was to connect hardware and software to deliver a compelling user experience. Can Apple connect multi-touch user interface, personal computing, phone, e-reader, smart phone, video games, cloud computing and streaming, etc to deliver a compelling new computing experience? Will this revolutionize our computing, surfing, reading, audio and video experiences? Will Apple make “tablet” main stream? Will Apple “tablet” change our concept of computing?
Tablet computers are already here, having been launched as long ago as November 2001 by none other than Jobs's arch-¬rival, Bill Gates. "I'm already using a [Microsoft] Tablet as my everyday computer," Gates told his audience at the Comdex show in Las Vegas back then. "It's a PC that is virtually without limits…Within five years, I predict it will be the most popular form of PC sold in America." So in some sense we have been waiting for the perfect “tablet” since 2001.
Mr. Jobs, we are ready. Surprise us. Call it what you want. I want two of this “tablet”.
January 22 2010
New release of Femap 10.1.1
Last week, Siemens announced a new release of Femap - version 10.1.1. It is the latest in a series of more than 30 successful product releases for the product. Thanks to my colleagues from Germany @SiemensPLM_DE who tweeted this out last week.
Driving the Femap 10.1.1 release is the inclusion of the latest version of our flagship simulation solver, NX Nastran 7. On the graphics and modeling side, Femap 10.1.1 continues the visualization theme of the previous 10.1 release, enhancing visibility control of solid parts, as well as adding the following capabilities:
- New bearing load definition
- Enhanced entity selection with keyboard shortcuts
- Text based filtering for selection of titled entities
You can find more details about Femap 10.1 and 10.1.1 from the Femap web site.
How our customers use our products never ceases to fascinate me, and proving to be no exception to that rule is SpaceWorks, a company that designs satellites. Challenged with developing off-the-shelf structural modules for fast satellite assembly (plug-and-play style), SpaceWorks worked with the consultant firm Predictive Engineering to gain insight into the satellites performance using Femap with NX Nastran. Using a hybrid modeling approach, the large and complex satellite design could be simulated efficiently, giving good correlation with experimental results, and in very fast solution times.
Read the SpaceWorks case study to find out more.
Tecnomatix 9.1: Automotive Body-in-White (BIW) Planning on Teamcenter
What’s the big deal with Teamcenter here? The manufacturing engineers now can use the same environment as the product engineers. This enables the manufacturing engineers to get product updates immediately without data conversion.
In addition Teamcenter provides platform services like revisions, effectivity, and change or variants management. And not to forget the communication and collaboration capabilities which support global engineering and manufacturing.
Let’s take a look at the planning workflow and focus on weld points. They are used to hold the nearly 400 single parts of the car body together.
These weld points are sometimes defined by the product engineer or by a weld specialist. Sometimes the weld points are not in the CAD system, but delivered via a Microsoft Excel file including x-, y- and z-coordinates. How do you know which weld point is relevant for which part or better parts? You can use the new and automatic capability to connect welds and parts based on spatial proximity.
Sometimes it happens that weld points are missing or that additional ones are required. In this case you can use the weld point creation wizard which guides through the creation process and demands all relevant information.
If you would like to go on working in Excel, the Excel Live integration enables you to load the weld points in Excel. Now you can change them having the rules engine of Teamcenter in the background ensuring the consistency of the data.
Once the weld points and parts are connected, the manufacturing engineer goes on assigning the single parts to the robotics stations.
The next step is the creation or re-use of weld operations and assigning to stations. These operations are later assigned to the single robots. But before that, the manufacturing engineer chose the relevant weld points and assigns them to the operations. The extended manufacturing search capability helps to find these weld points, e.g. find all welds in a certain area or from a certain type.
Finally the definition of the right sequence of operations is done, so that the cycle time (or takt time) is utilized as good as possible.
Once the planning part is done, you can go on with the 3D planning and simulation by using Process Simulate. You can launch this directly out of Teamcenter. But that’s something for a different post to write about.
You want to know more? Take a look at the Tecnomatix 9.1 or the Robotics and Automation Planning page.
January 20 2010
Regional Users Meeting - San Jose California
Have you attended a Siemens PLM Users group meeting in the past? Are you aware of the annual conference and that there are users group meetings held regionally throughout the year? If not, you should.
I have just returned from the Northern California Regional Users group meeting, which was held in San Jose California. This event provided a forum for users to hear the latest about the Siemens PLM family of products. More importantly, this event helped Northern California users network with other users to share experiences and new ideas.
There were 2 keynote sessions. First John R. Baker, reviewed what’s new in NX7, and gave us a preview of some of the many things coming in the next release of NX.

(I apologize for the poor picture quality, I forgot to bring my camera, so these were taken with my camera Phone )
Next up was Dave McLaughlin, who provided us with an update to Teamcenter 8.

In the afternoon, there were six different break-out sessions;
NX CAE Update
Marilyn Tomlin
NX7; HD3D & Synchronous Technology
Jerry Sarfati
Managing Electronics; MCAD, ECAD, & Software
Krish Krishnamurthy
Motion Control; Overview of Siemens Controllers
Daniel Martinez
Tecnomatix; Part Assembly/Planning & Simulation
Sean Bradley
NX PMI - The shift from paper to electronic
Dave Wingrave
I’d like to thank everyone (Dave, Lorena, and many others) that helped put on this event. I was very impressed with the cooperative nature of the attendees. Everyone wanted to learn and share and it appeared that all would walk away with new ideas for making their environments more productive.
The next time you hear about a local users meeting – do your best to attend. You will learn something, you will make new contacts, and even more importantly – you might just help a fellow colleague.
Jerry
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...





The Finish Line: a look at Siemens PLM 2010 Racing Teams
I have an upcoming work trip to Europe at the end of February that will take me to four countries in 12 days. I will be writing more about this including interviews with our channel partners and some of our own Siemens PLM folks, pictures and insights into what is happening in the SMB market.
This week, I was speaking with a colleague about my impending trip. Back in 2008, Dora shared a video on Andretti Green Racing and Hendrick Motorsports but we, Siemens PLM, have never fully shared the scope of the race teams that use our software here on the blog. Below is a list of teams from the US and their drivers that use PLM software from Siemens:
Hendrick Motorsports
Dale Earnhardt Jr. #88
Jeff Gordon #24
Jimmie Johnson #48
Mark Martin #5
Joe Gibbs Racing
Kyle Busch #18
Denny Hamlin #11
Joey Logano #20
Red Bull Racing
Scott Speed #82
Brian Vickers #83
Roush Fenway Racing
Greg Biffle #16
Carl Edwards #99
Matt Kenseth #17
David Ragan #6
Andretti Autosport
Marco Andretti #26
Tony Kanaan #11
Danica Patrick #7
Ryan Hunter-Reay #37
KB Racing
Greg Anderson
Jason Line
Wayne Taylor Racing
Max Angelelli
Ricky Taylor
Back when I started my job in 2000, I had the opportunity to meet Mark Bringle, technical sponsor and marketing director for Joe Gibbs Racing. I gave Mark a quick call and asked him about the upcoming start to the season. (NASCAR begins on Valentine's Day, February 14, in Daytona Beach, Florida) Here's what Mark had to say:
Mark also shared that JGR is using Social Media to it's advantage. They now have an "internet guru" named Bryan 'Boris' Cook who blogs and tweets from pit row.
Good luck to all the Siemens race teams this year!